Pages

August 5, 2014

Acoustic bottle beams hold promise for acoustic imaging, cloaking and levitation

The sound energy forms a 3D acoustic bottle of high-pressure walls and a null region in th...

The sound energy forms a 3D acoustic bottle of high-pressure walls and a null region in the middle – pressure field at bottom shows self-bending ability of the bottle beam to circumvent 3D obstacles, while dashed arrows indicate wave front direction (Image: Xiang Zhang group/ UC Berkeley)

Using a technique that has possible applications in acoustic cloaking, sonic levitation, ultrasonic imaging, and particle manipulation, scientists at the University of California Berkeley claim to have produced a "bottle" beam of acoustic energy in open air that can precisely redirect sound waves. Able to bend these waves along set trajectories without the need for waveguides or other mechanical assistance, the bottle beam is also able to flow around objects in its path while maintaining its shape.

Sound waves – like light waves – travel in straight lines, but can be bent through reflection, diffraction, or refraction. In the case of the Berkeley Lab experiments, the researchers bent sound waves using an array of acoustic transducers – effectively high-frequency loudspeakers – some 1.5 cm (0.6 in) in diameter, spaced 2.5 cm (0.98 in) apart and operating at a frequency of 10 kHz. This array was able to directly alter the phase and direction at which each sound wave was generated so that a defined set of pressure fields with distinct trajectories were created in the air.

As a result, the team claimed to have produced an acoustic bottle beam whose sound waves travel through the high pressure wall of its curved shell to flow around a zero pressure center. In this way, the sound waves are held together and are able to travel on in this fashion over some distance. The acoustic bottle beam is also uninfluenced by solid objects that are placed in its path, with the shape and characteristics of the sound waves reforming after flowing around the object.

"Our acoustic bottle beams open new avenues to applications in which there is a need to access hard-to-reach objects hidden behind obstacles, such as acoustic imaging and therapeutic ultrasound through inhomogeneous media," said Berkeley Lab researcher Tongcang Li. "We can also use an acoustic bottle as a cloaking device, re-routing sound waves around an object and then recovering them in their original form, making the object invisible to sonar detection."

As the high pressure exterior of the acoustic bottle also applies a dragging force to the surrounding air, no sound waves can pass through the zero pressure interior of the bottle thereby making it suitable for acoustic trapping. In this way, nanoparticles and similarly microscopic objects may be held in place with nothing more than sound wave pressure surrounding them.

Similarly, acoustic levitation, where sound waves are used to move and handle microscopically small objects, such as nanoparticles, microbes, or water droplets, may also be rendered possible by continued development of this research. The team also believes that their work may find use in the likes of 3D graphic printing and object manipulation by emulating recent standing wave experiments in that area.

"Our acoustic bottle beams can do the same thing but offer better stability, true 3D graphics, and more freedom of motion as our beam can propagate along a curved path," said co-researcher Xuefeng Zhu. "We can also levitate much larger 3D objects than can be lifted and manipulated with other acoustic levitation techniques."

By creating acoustic beam propagation along prescribed trajectories without the need for mechanical intervention, the team may also have offered significant advances in applications such as medical ultrasound imaging and therapeutic ultrasound, where the direction of beam travel is difficult to control through the body.

"Since the principle of adjusted phased arrays is well-established and now being used in ultrasound imaging, we can directly apply our acoustic bottle beam technique to current acoustic systems," said Peng Zhang, lead author of a paper that described this work. "Our technique offers a new degree of freedom for controlling the flow of acoustic energy at will."

The research was supported by the Office of Naval Research's MURI program, and a paper describing the experiments was published in the journal Nature Communications.

Chic features sure to impress Amazon Fire

Amazon Fire is a good smartphone, but not all the new high-tech features Amazon is promoting. In fact, some of these characteristics are more tiring than really useful.

 

Fire phone has everything you really need: fast Internet access, high-quality camera, good maps, and many applications available through its own app store Amazon. However, Amazon has decided to highlight several unusual features on the screen of your phone marketing campaign-"dynamic approach" Firefly feature, and support services Mayday. Unfortunately, this does not impress me much.

Amazon Fire

New tricks seem to resist fire, at least initially. The dynamic point of view, for example, is fine. The use of sensors in each of the four corners on the side of the phone screen, the device can detect how he moves on his face, and use this information to create a 3-D effect on the screen. This represents a slight delighted the audience with my friends, but beyond getting some oh and ah, it does not add much.

Support service Mayday is another unique feature that could be great, especially for beginners, but is not there yet. If you have questions about your phone, simply click on the icon of the distress call of the screen, and within seconds, you are video chatting with someone Amazon help desk (who the person is, but he or she will see the screen of the phone). If necessary, the representative of the Amazon can take control of your phone and will walk you through what you need.

Unfortunately, both times using the service once to ask how to display the time on the screen of my house and once to ask why I received an error message when I tried to take a picture pan-advocates need to climb answers. In the first case, a man picked up my phone and played with it until I figured out how to change the screen (I could have done that). In the second case, a woman had to ask me to hold while she researched.

Mayday is always welcome, if for no other reason why it's good to have people there to help you work through a problem, even if they have an immediate response. In a world of automated customer service, talk to a human being is refreshing.

Finally, the function of the firefly. This is both awesome and unpleasant time. It's great because you can point the phone just about any object and usually recognizes what it is. Firefly does not work at all, but he acknowledged the current issue of MIT Technology Review sat at my desk, and many other objects, like a box of pumpkin and a box of staples. You can also recognize the music as well as TV shows and movies, in case you want to buy something to catch a fragment.

Firefly is unpleasant because it seems a little more than one way to get people to buy more Amazon products. Firefly always recognize an object, the first thing to question is whether you want to buy. Even if the subject is not really a product, it becomes an Amazon. For example, when my friends and I were in our kitchen Firefly-ing, Sam Adams logo on one of our beer glasses became a Samuel Adams Boston Lager metal $ 20.50, and the image of the draft my roommate law Clinton stopped in their iPhone has become the State of the Union Address 2000 Audio CD from $ 10.99.

Despite his new capacity, Amazon phone fire serves only to illustrate the smart phone industry as a whole. With the most technologically prowess device manufacturers working so hard to stand out from the pack, even can start to look like they are trying a little too hard.

2014 MacBook Pro with Retina Display vs. MacBook Air

Gizmag compares the features and specs of the latest versions of the MacBook Pro with Reti...

Gizmag compares the features and specs of the latest versions of the MacBook Pro with Retina Display and MacBook Air

After Apple refreshed its MacBook Pro with Retina Display lineup last week, perhaps you're wondering how the new models compare to Apple's other flagship notebook, the MacBook Air? Let's put the two side-by-side to compare their features and specs.

Before we jump in, note that we're comparing the 13-in models of both MacBooks. The Retina MacBook Pro is also sold in a larger 15-in version, while the Air also comes in a smaller 11-in model. We're focusing on the common ground where the two do direct battle.

Size

The MacBook Air's thinness advantage is greater than this metric suggests

Nothing has changed here, as the new Retina MacBooks have identical exteriors to the last (late 2013) model. That still has the Air measuring 4 percent taller and 3 percent wider.

As for depth, well, you'll want to take this measurement with a few grains of salt. It only accounts for the thickest point of the MacBook Air, which is tapered. The MacBook Pro has a uniform thickness and, in practice, isn't nearly as close to the Air's razor-thin build as this 1 mm discrepancy would suggest.

Weight

The MacBook Air is 14 percent lighter

Despite having a larger face, the MacBook Air is still 14 percent lighter than the rMBP. This is one of the biggest reasons to choose the Air over the Pro.

Build

Though they have different designs, both laptops have the same unibody aluminum build

No surprises here, as both MacBooks have slick unibody builds, forged out of Apple's favorite, aluminum.

Backlit keyboard

Both MacBooks have backlit keyboards

Apple's MacBooks keyboards are still hard to beat, and, like all modern MacBooks, these have adjustable backlit keys so you can hammer away at your masterpiece in the dark.

Display (size)

Both notebooks have 13.3-in displays

You'll find a 13.3-in screen on each of this notebooks.

Display (resolution)

Display resolution is still a huge advantage for the Retina MacBook Pro

This is still the most obvious reason to pay extra for the Retina MacBook Pro. It gives you 216 percent more pixels than the MacBook Air's mid-ranged resolution does, providing a much clearer and crisper window into your content.

Touch screen

No touch screens to be found here

Windows 8 and 8.1 have moved notebooks into the realm of touch, but Apple hasn't shown any interest in traveling that road. And with the large and responsive glass trackpads that you'll find on Apple's MacBooks, it's hard to argue that they're missing out.

Processor

The new Retina MacBooks saw a minor speed bump over the late 2013 models

The Retina MacBook is still the more powerful machine, and it widened that gap a little more with the speed boost in these mid-2014 models. Also keep in mind that we're only looking at the entry-level CPUs in each machine: you can pay more to configure both machines with (up to) Intel Core i7s.

Graphics

Graphics is a slight advantage for the Retina MacBook

The MacBook Pro with Retina Display still has a (slight) advantage with its integrated Intel Iris GPU.

RAM

The Retina MacBook now ships with a minimum 8 GB of RAM

This is another big boost over the late 2013 Retina MacBooks, as all new models ship with a minimum 8 GB of RAM. This should be especially handy if you like to run Windows in virtualization software like Parallels or VMware Fusion.

Storage

Storage tiers (the highest for each is a built-to-order configuration)

No changes here, and the only difference between the two notebooks is that the rMBP has an extra 1 TB tier (as a paid upgrade) that the Air doesn't offer. The Air's 512 GB model is, likewise, a made-to-order configuration.

USB 3.0 ports

We're scoping two USB 3.0 ports in each notebook

Both machines provide two USB 3.0 ports each.

Thunderbolt ports

Thunderbolt ports

The Retina MacBook has two Thunderbolt ports, while the 13-in Air only offers one.

SDXC reader

Each machine has a full-sized SD card slot

Each laptop has one full-sized SD card slot.

Video out

Video out options for each machine (though you could argue that USB should be included her...

If you want to see your MacBook's display on a TV or desktop monitor, the Retina MacBook gives you the option of plugging in a standard HDMI cable. For the Air, you'll need to connect that HDMI to a Mini DisplayPort adapter (which its Thunderbolt port is backwards-compatible with) or perhaps route something through the USB port.

Camera

Both MacBooks have standard 720p front-facing cameras

Each machine has a 720p front-facing webcam on board.

Battery

Battery life is one of the few advantages for the MacBook Air

No battery boost for the new Retina model, as the Air is still going to give you a few extra hours with typical use. That's one of the few advantages of going with the Air's lower-resolution screen.

Wi-Fi

Both support the latest (and fastest) Wi-Fi standard, 802.11ac

In addition to older standards, both of the latest MacBooks are ready to roll with the latest (and fastest) 802.11ac Wi-Fi standard. Of course you'll also need an 802.11ac compatible router to enjoy those faster speeds and, unless your internet service is unusually zippy, you might only notice a difference across your local network (as opposed to when downloading files or streaming media from the internet).

Software

Both run the latest version of OS X (currently Mavericks, soon to be Yosemite)

Both Macs ship with OS X Mavericks. When it releases later this (Northern) Fall, the redesigned OS X Yosemite will be a free download for both machines.

Release

Both models have now seen 2014 refreshes (albeit minor ones)

Apple just launched this slight refresh to the Retina MacBook Pro last week, while a (similarly minor) update to the Air hit store shelves back in April.

Starting price

The Air can save you US$300 (these are the starting prices, and both sprout up from here)

Some of the higher-end Retina MacBooks saw a price drop with this latest update, but the bar of entry is still the same US$1,300. If you can put up with its lower-resolution display and less impressive horsepower, then the Air can save you $300.

This is also a good time to keep an eye out for discounts on the late 2013 Retina MacBook Pros. If you can find those for a couple hundred bucks less than the newer models are going for, I think that's a deal worth considering. They have slightly slower processors and less RAM, but the same exterior, display and battery life – along with performance that's still top-of-the-line for all but the most demanding power users.

For more on the Retina MacBook, you can hit up our review of the late 2013 model.

oneTesla shrinks its singing Tesla coil kit to palm-friendly proportions

The tinyTelsa musical Telsa coil from oneTesla

The tinyTelsa musical Telsa coil from oneTesla

The folks who successfully crowdfunded a DIY singing Tesla coil kit last year have taken to Kickstarter again to bring a smaller version into production. Like its older and bigger brother, the tinyTesla shoots out bolts of artificial lightning while playing MIDI music using the electricity itself. It looks like that polyphonic MIDI version of Danger High Voltage by Electric Six might just come in handy after all.

As with the original coil kit, the aim of the tinyTesla kit is to make learning about electronics fun. This time around though, Bayley Wang, Heidi Baumgartner and the rest of the oneTesla team say that the new addition is even easier to assemble, as well as being a good deal shorter (it's about 6 inches tall).

The DIY coil kits will be made available in two versions: one for coilers who can handle a soldering iron and a solderless tinyTesla for folks who'd rather such things were done for them. Some helpful tutorials have been uploaded to oneTesla's YouTube channel, and there are plans to add more soon.

Can you spot the tinyTelsa from this line-up?

The tinyTesla is a solid-state Tesla coil that's said to offer a balance of performance, musical ability and reliability. It features a non-resonant primary coil, a pre-wound resonant secondary that's topped by an aluminum toroid topload, and a 3-inch circular control board powered by Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) half-bridge inverters running on a 340 V bus sits atop a hedgehog heat sink. The device is available in both 110 and 220 V versions.

An interrupter connects to the tinyTesla by fiber optic cable and converts polyphonic MIDI audio files from a computer (or instrument) connected via USB into pulses of light that switch the entire coil on and off at frequencies within the audio range we can hear. The video below shows a tinyTesla taking care of business with some chirpy pirate music.

In response to feedback from builders of the first version, the oneTesla team has also produced a 12-inch TS dual-resonant solid state model "with a focus on reliability, portability and usability." It has its own MIDI-in port for direct interfacing with MIDI devices, but can also be connected to a computer via the included USB adapter, and supports MIDI features like note sustain and pitch bend. It's also designed to produce long sparks.

The oneTesla TS has been designed to produce long sparks

The current Kickstarter campaign smashed through its funding target in less than 12 hours, and ends on August 15. The first three rounds of rewards have all gone, so backers will now need to pledge at least US$149 for a tinyTesla kit with delivery estimated for January 2015, or $399 for a TS with December 2014 delivery, assuming all goes to plan.

Thanks to a few stretch goals being reached, a few extra features have been added to both devices (including a fixed frequency mode and SD card support).

Have a look at the pitch video for the educational Tesla coil kit below.

Two weeks with PulseOn's (beta) heart rate monitor

The PulseOn is a new heart-rate monitor fitness device

The PulseOn is a new heart-rate monitor fitness device

A new fitness device claims it will make heart rate monitoring easier than ever. The PulseOn is a wrist-worn device with an optical heart rate sensor and an accompanying mobile app to store and present data. Gizmag took it for a spin to see if its claim would stand up.

We should start by saying that the PulseOn heart rate monitor is still very much in beta – and it shows. When the final device is shipped, the company tells us that its screen will be better, metallic finishings will be polished, the quality of the strap material will be improved, the overall quality and feel of the device will be better, the software will be more stable, additional features will be added, the battery life will be improved and data about distance and speed will be shown on the display.

The PulseOn is small with a curved glass screen

This is all good news, because I can confirm that the screen is unreadable in direct sunlight, the current strap is made of cheap polyester, the device is a little awkward to use, the software was a bit flaky at points, stated features are missing and the battery has been draining quickly even when the device has been switched off.

Despite all of the room for improvement, two key features of the PulseOn were unimpeded by the necessary updates. The device has an optical heart rate sensor that the company claims is "by far the most accurate optical heart rate solution in the market." The accompanying mobile app, meanwhile, supposedly helps to explain the data collected and "tell you what your heart rate means". With both of these features present, we were eager to test drive the PulseOn.

One button is used to initiate exercise session recording, while the other scrolls through...

The device's main body actually looks quite sleek. It is small (according to PulseOn it's the smallest on the market) and has a curved bezel bleeding into a flat screen. Hinges for the strap help the device to wrap around the user's wrist and there are only two buttons to worry about. One button is used to initiate exercise session recording, while the other scrolls through info like time and heart rate. The buttons are a touch fiddly and the symbols on them aren't exactly self-explanatory, but once you know which is which then the device is simple enough to use.

The PulseOn is charged using a large crocodile clip with contacts that align with corresponding contacts on the bottom of the watch itself. This may void the need for a USB port in the device itself, but is also overly fiddly. Magnetic contacts, or perhaps a wireless charging pad, would be far easier to use.

The rear of the PulseOn shows the optical sensor and contacts for charging the device

The optical sensor does appear to be all it's cracked up to be. PulseOn told us that it uses "multiple wavelengths to dynamically read blood flow in different depths of the skin." The main benefit of this is that a chest strap is no longer required for accurate heart rate monitoring (though that's old news, with Samsung also placing standalone heart monitors in the Galaxy S5 and four different smartwatches). Repeated tests against a manual heart rate count over 60 seconds, though, did show the PulseOn to be consistently accurate.

The PulseOn pairs with a smartphone via Bluetooth, which is as straightforward as pairing any other device with your phone. When you load up the mobile app, an icon in the top right corner will indicate whether or not the app recognizes the devices as successfully paired. PulseOn automatically syncs any data with the user's mobile device, so there's no manual syncing required.

The PulseOn app provides data an insights about the user's exercise sessions

Once the app has synced at least one set of data, it's possible to see just how insightful PulseOn can be and to what extent it explains the data for you as promised. The data provided is certainly extensive. The app puts a general fitness score and a "time to full recovery" front and center. Information about the user's latest fitness session includes length of session time, heart rate, intensity and calories burned. The company plans to soon add a distance travelled figure as well. Rotating your phone into landscape mode shows the data in graph format (a somewhat clunky navigation element) and exercise history can be shown by event, week, month or year.

Unfortunately, PulseOn's assurance that it will tell the user "what their heart rate means" doesn't entirely hold true. How the fitness score is calculated and what it actually means are a little murky. The score is accompanied by phrases like "improving fitness" or "maintaining fitness," but these aren't especially enlightening either. Elsewhere, it is not explained whether the heart rate figure is a peak or an average (or, for that matter, what its significance is). Similarly, it presents calories burned without context. There is no indication about how any of this data should inform your next workout. That isn't uncommon among today's fitness trackers, but it also doesn't measure up to PulseOn's claims.

The app itself is available on iOS and Android. I was using it on an Android device and found the UI to be a bit clunky. Navigation wasn't the most intuitive and some transitions were slow and jittery. But having said that, all of the data was presented clearly.

The PulseOn uses a simple means of securing the strap

I have no doubt that the PulseOn is a device that can produce some accurate and useful data. The company is also promising some big improvements before this wearable ships to the public. But it's crucial that the app presents the user's data with more context and significance than it does now. And with perfectly capable heart rate monitors showing up in more all-purpose mobile and wearable devices, it's harder to justify plunking down US$200 for a single-purpose device like PulseOn. But, who knows, maybe the final release will change all of that.

The PulseOn will retail for $199 and is due to begin shipping in September this year.